THE CORRELATION BETWEEN PSYCHOSOCIAL RISK FACTORS AND WORK PERFORMANCE IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
Nature of psychosocial risk as to the unseen hazards in the working population, potentially exposing the workers towards the adverse effect of mental health. Compromising the well- being of mental health could lead to deterioration of work performance. The objective of this study is to analyze the constructed measure of psychosocial risk factors and work performance of manufacturing workers using statistical analysis. Then, the constructed measure is used to find the correlations between the two factors. A set of the questionnaire is administered to 258 manufacturing workers. The questionnaires were adapted and adopted from Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III), NIOSH Generic Job Stress Questionnaire, and Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ 1.0) and the instrument were found to be reliable (Cronbach Alpha value = 0.7 ). After conducting Exploratory Factor Analysis by using Principal Component Analysis, the construct validity to conduct data collection in the manufacturing industry is tested. Using eight factors understudy that already extracted using factor analysis, it is found that there are significant psychosocial risk factors present in the manufacturing industry. As for the association between psychosocial and work performance, it is found that there is a significant association between psychosocial risk factors and work performance. This study is essential to explore the presence of psychosocial risk factors that underlies in the manufacturing industry, which might affect worker performance and well-being. For future research, it is recommended so that this study can be replicated to other manufacturing industry or different types of industries to see the robustness of the developed instruments. At the same time, the issue of psychosocial risk factors and workers' performance also can be identified, and the mitigation can be planned.
2. Pereira A, Fernandes C. Exposure to psychosocial risk factors in the context of work : a systematic review. 2016;
3. Tomaschek A, Lanfer SSL, Melzer M, Debitz U, Buruck G. Measuring work-related psychosocial and physical risk factors using workplace observations: a validation study of the “Healthy Workplace Screening.” Saf Sci . 2018;101:197–208.
4. Leka S, Cox T. The European Framework for Psychosocial Risk Management: PRIMA-EF. 2008
5. Leka S, Jain A. Health impact of Psychosocial Hazards at Work: An Overview . World Health Organization. World Health Organization (WHO); 2010 . 126 p.
6. Bergh LIV, Hinna S, Leka S, Jain A. Developing a performance indicator for psychosocial risk in the oil and gas industry. Saf Sci. 2014;62:98–106.
7. Cox T, Griffiths A. The nature and measurement of work-related stress: theory and practice. 2005.
8. Koopmans L, Bernaards C, Hildebrandt V, Van Buuren S, Van Der Beek AJ, de Vet HC w. Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. Int J Product Perform Manag. 2012;62(1):6–28.
9. International Labour Office. Integrating Health Promotion into Work place OSH Policies: Participant’s Workbook Pub. 2012.
10. Munisamy S. Identifying Factors That Influences Job Performance Amongst Employees In Oil Palm Plantation. A Project Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the requirements for the degree of Bachelor in Psychology. 2013;79.
11. Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers. Industrial Accidents in the Manufacturing Sector, A Cause for Concern (Apr 14, 2011)2017.
12. DOSH. Website Department of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia - DOSH Profile . 1. 2016. p.1. Available from: http://www.dosh.gov.my/index.php/en/occupational-accident-statistics/by-sector
13. Law of Malaysia. Laws of Malaysia-Occupational Safety and Health Act and Regulations (Act 514). 21st ed. MDC Legal Advisors, editor. Kuala Lumpur: MDC Publisher Sdn Bhd (91168-A); 2013. 362 p.
14. Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Heal. 2005;31(6):438–49.
15. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Generic Job Stress Questionnaire. NIOSH Generic Job Stress Quest Natl Inst Occup Saf Heal. 2011;45226(513):1–38.