HEALTH EFFICACY AND ASSERTIVENESS SCALE IN MALAY LANGUAGE: A VALIDATION STUDY

  • Mohd Nazir Mohd Nazori School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Rohani Ismail School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Nur Syahmina Rasudin School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Rosminah Mohamed School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Norhayati Mohd Noor School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Zailiza Sulli Hulu Langat Health District Office, Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
  • Noor Azliah Ahmad Zainuri Petaling Health District Office, Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
  • Masitah Mohamed Klang Health District Office, Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
  • Ashvini Jayapalan Gombak Health District Office, Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
Keywords: Health self-efficacy, health assertiveness, questionnaire validation, health efficacy and assertiveness scale, structural equation modelling

Abstract

Modern medical practice emphasises mutual decision-making between healthcare professionals and patients. This pre-requisites health self-efficacy and health assertiveness in patients. However, lack of general health self-efficacy and health assertiveness measure limits research in the local setting. This study aimed to translate and validate Health Efficacy and Assertiveness Scale (HEAS) into Malay language. Malay version of HEAS was obtained through back-to-back translation process. This was tested for factorial validity via exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using structural equation modelling. Reliability was established using Cronbach’s alpha. Five items measured health self-efficacy whereas eight items measured health assertiveness on two subdimensions (assert to be informed and assert opinion). Reliability index was 0.76 for health self-efficacy and 0.73 for health assertiveness. CFA on health efficacy measurement model reporting fit indices: χ2/df 1.28, comparative fit index (CFI) 0.96, Tucker-Lewis’s index (TLI) 0.94, and root mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.07. CFA on health assertiveness revealed improved fit indices: χ2/df was 1.52, comparative fit index (CFI) 0.94, Tucker-Lewis’s index (TLI) 0.91, and root mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.10. Thus, the Malay HEAS questionnaire established acceptable factorial validity and good reliability on Cronbach’s alpha. Universal nature of the items allowed use in different population and health scenarios.

References

Hall DE, Prochazka A V, Fink AS. Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ. 2012;4(5):312-327. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00087515

Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ Psychol. 1993;28(2):117-148. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP2802_3

Bandura A. Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. In: Urdan T, Pajares F, eds. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Information Age Publishing; 2006:307-337. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Bandura A, Locke EA. Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J Appl Gerontol. 2003;88(1):87-99. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87

Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006;1(2):164-180. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

Brewer NT, Rimer BK. Perspectives on health behaviour theories that focus on individuals. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanth K, eds. Health Behaviour and Health Education; Theory, Research and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008:149-165.

Petrovic K, Burney S, Fletcher J. The relationship of knowledge, health value and health self-efficacy with men’s intentions to receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. J Health Psychol. 2011;16(8):1198-1207. doi:10.1177/1359105311402861

Rimal RN, Real K. Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change. Hum Commun Res. 2003;29(3):370-399. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00844.x

Glassi MD, Glassi J. Assertion: a critical review. Psychother theory, Res Pract. 1978;46:537-546.

Thomson A, Vallée-tourangeau G, Suggs LS. Strategies to increase vaccine acceptance and uptake : From behavioral communications and interventions. Vaccine. 2018;36(44):6457-6458. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.031

Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(3):291-309. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031

Keij SM, van Duijn-Bakker N, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH. What makes a patient ready for Shared Decision Making? A qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;(2019). doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.031

Krupat E, Irish JT, Kasten LE, et al. Patient assertiveness and physician decision-making among older breast cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(4):449-457. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00106-9

Ahmad Sharoni SK, Abdul Rahman H, Minhat HS, Shariff-Ghazali S, Azman Ong MH. The effects of self-efficacy enhancing program on foot self-care behaviour of older adults with diabetes: A randomised controlled trial in elderly care facility, Peninsular Malaysia. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0192417. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192417

Devarajooh C, Chinna K. Depression, distress and self-efficacy: The impact on diabetes self-care practices. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0175096. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175096

Appalasamy JR, Joseph JP, Seeta Ramaiah S, Quek KF, Md Zain AZ, Tha KK. Exploring stroke survivors’ self-efficacy in understanding and taking medication and determining associated factors: a cross-sectional study in a neurology clinic in Malaysia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:1463-1475. doi:10.2147/PPA.S215271

Hasan SI, Mohd Hairi F, Ahmad Tajuddin NA, Amer Nordin AS. Empowering healthcare providers through smoking cessation training in Malaysia: a preintervention and postintervention evaluation on the improvement of knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e030670. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030670

Seow KC, Mohamed Yusoff D, Koh YLE, Tan NC. What is the test-retest reliability of the Malay version of the Hypertension Self-Care Profile self efficacy assessment tool? A validation study in primary care. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e016152. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016152

Ng YK, Shah NM, Loong LS, Pee LT, Hidzir SAM, Chong WW. Attitudes toward concordance and self-efficacy in decision making: a cross-sectional study on pharmacist-patient consultations. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:615-624. doi:10.2147/PPA.S159113

Wu SL, Yaacob SN. Self-efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between parental closeness and suicidal ideation among Malaysian adolescents. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2017;22(2):84-90. doi:10.1111/camh.12188

Engku Kamarudin EM, Wan Sulaiman WS, Sarnon NH, Amin AS. Data on self-awareness, self-determination, and self-efficacy of opioid-dependent patients receiving methadone treatment before and after getting individual psycho-educational (i-SEAZ) intervention. Data Br. 2020;30:105586. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105586

Ahmadian M, Carmack S, Samah AA, Kreps G, Saidu MB. Psychosocial Predictors of Breast Self-Examination among Female Students in Malaysia: A Study to Assess the Roles of Body Image, Self-efficacy and Perceived Barriers. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):1277-1284. doi:10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.3.1277

Isa A, Loke YK, Smith JR, Papageorgiou A, Hunter PR. Mediational effects of self-efficacy dimensions in the relationship between knowledge of dengue and dengue preventive behaviour with respect to control of dengue outbreaks: a structural equation model of a cross-sectional survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(9):e2401. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002401

Sabo A, Kueh YC, Kuan G. Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the self-efficacy for exercise scale. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0215698. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215698

Stadtlander LM, Sickel AE, Giles MJ. Validation of the Health Efficacy and Assertiveness Scale. In: Walden University Summer Session. Walden University; 2015.

Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Recommendations for the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Health Status Measures.; 1998. https://www.ortho.umn.edu/sites/ortho.umn.edu/files/recommendations-cultural.pdf

Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013;73(6):913-934. doi:10.1177/0013164413495237

Published
2022-04-28
How to Cite
Mohd Nazir Mohd Nazori, Rohani Ismail, Nur Syahmina Rasudin, Rosminah Mohamed, Norhayati Mohd Noor, Zailiza Sulli, Noor Azliah Ahmad Zainuri, Masitah Mohamed, & Ashvini Jayapalan. (2022). HEALTH EFFICACY AND ASSERTIVENESS SCALE IN MALAY LANGUAGE: A VALIDATION STUDY. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22(1), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.22/no.1/art.1412