• Moy FM Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
  • Atiya AS Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya
Keywords: Nominal group technique (NOT), health promotion, lifestyle behaviors


The nominal group technique (NOT) was used as part of a needs assessment of a health promotion project on healthy lifestyle behavior. Two aspects of healthy lifestyle behaviors which were physical exercise and healthy diet were selected by the participants. Two NOT groups were carried out simultaneously by two facilitators. A Likert scale of 1 -10 was used to rank the importance of ideas generated during the discussion. The level of group support was ranked by the median while the level of agreement was ranked by the mean absolute deviation from the median. The representativeness of the NOT group was assessed with the subjects who did not participate in the NOT procedure. The level of agreement was observed to be higher in the NOT group for both the physical exercise and diet groups. The reasons could be due to clarification and discussion which were carried out in the NOT group. The rank order of the exercise group did not differ in the NOT and the survey groups (Mann-Whitney U test, z= 1.65, P=O. 2) , however the diet group showed different ranking with higher ranking from the survey group (Mann-Whitney U test, z= 1 .33, p=0.02). This could be due to the higher ranking assigned by the subjects in the survey group. Despite the difference in the ranking order in one of the groups, the researchers felt that the NOT outcomes are still representative of the larger group and will generate more information in developing a questionnaire in the planning and implementation of the health promotion program.


1. Van de Ven AH & Delbecq AL. The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. Am] Public Health 1972; 69:337-342.

2. O'Neil MJ & Jackson L. Nominal group technique: a process for initiating curriculum development in higher education. Studies in Higher Edu 1983; 8: 129 138.

3. Thomas B. Using nominal group technique to identify researchable problems. J Nursing Edu 1983; 22: 335-337.

4. Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, Bradshaw C & Webb I. TI1e nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice. Fam Pract 1993; 10: 76-81.

5. Carney 0, McIntosh J & Worth A. The use of the nominal group technique in research with community nurses. J Advanced Nursing. 1996; 23: 1024-1029.

6. Scott D & Deadrick D. The nominal group technique: applications for training needs assessment. Training & Development] 1982; June: 26-33.

7. O'Neil M. Nominal group technique: an evaluation data collection process. Evaluation Newsletter 1981; 5: 44-60.

8. Moore C. Group techniques for idea building. Sage: Newbury Park, California. 1987.

9. Vella K, Ooldfrad C, Rowan K, BionJ, Black N. Use of consensus development to establish national research prioties in critical care. BMJ 2000; 320 (7240): 976-980
How to Cite
Moy FM, & Atiya AS. (2004). THE USE OF NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE IN PROMOTION OF HEALTHY LIFESTYLE . Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 4(1), 19-21. Retrieved from