PREFERRED METHOD OF PURCHASING SUPPLEMENTS AMONG GOVERNMENT SERVANTS IN PUTRAJAYA
Keywords:Supplements, Traditional, Online, Unregistered supplements, counterfeit supplements
Despite the risk of buying dangerous unregistered or counterfeit health supplement products online, the purchases still persist. This study aimed to identify the current preferred purchasing method and factors that influenced the preference. A cross-sectional study using simple random sampling was conducted among supplement purchasers within government servants in Putrajaya, Malaysia. Data were collected using an online self-reported questionnaire from 1st February to 1st August 2020. The traditional method became the preferred way of purchasing supplements (Traditional=68% vs Online=32%). However, younger and middle group (OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.41–3.21 and OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.22–3.82, respectively), females (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.05–1.80) and, non-Malays (Indian and others, OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.11–0.95 and OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.17–0.88, respectively) significantly preferred online purchases. Product quality was the most important factor for both purchasing methods (P<0.001). Meanwhile, the main motivating factor for choosing the traditional method was ‘ease of getting the product to advise and relevant information (n=595, 72.4%), in online, it was ‘being able to read the product reviews through the internet (IT)’ (n=205, 52.8%). The majority of respondents checked for many similar supplement products before purchase (50.9% Traditional and 38.4% Online). Surprisingly, no significant differences were found in knowledge for identifying registered products between both methods (p=0.330). The traditional method was still preferred and indicates that the health awareness of the respondents is encouraging. However, this result cannot be generalized to the population. Hence, efforts to enhance public knowledge, awareness, and promoting the safety and efficacious issues on registered supplement products must be continued.
International K. The Truth about Onl i Ne Consumers 2017 Global Online Consumer Report.; 2017.
Fittler et al. Consumers turning to the internet pharmacy market: Cross-sectional study on the frequency and attitudes of hungarian patients purchasing medications online. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(8). doi:10.2196/11115
Alan M. Many supplements contain unapproved, dangerous ingredients: study. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-10-supplements-unapproved-dangerous-ingredients.html. Published 2018. Accessed November 30, 2019.
World Health Organization. Orientation Programme on Adolescent Health for Health-Care Providers.; 2014.
Williams and McKnight. The Real Impact of Counterfeit Medications. US Pharm. 2014;39(6)(Generic Drug Review suppl):44-46. https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/counterfeit-meds. Published 2014. Accessed December 1, 2019.
Milton. The counterfeit menace | The Star Online. https://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/health/2015/01/04/the-counterfeit-menace. Published 2015. Accessed November 30, 2019.
Gupta P, Sethi N. Comparative Study of Online and Offline Shopping: A Case Study of Rourkela in Odisha.; 2015.
G. Rezai ZMMNS and MZZ. Effect of Consumer Demographic Factors on Purchasing Herbal Products Online in Malaysia.; 2013.
Wong et.al. Exploring online and offline shopping motivational values in Malaysia. Asia Pacific J Mark Logist. 2018;30(2):352-379. doi:10.1108/APJML-10-2016-0197
Harn ACP, Khatibi A, Ismail H bin. E-Commerce: A Study on Online Shopping in Malaysia. J Soc Sci. 2006;13(3):231-242. doi:10.1080/09718923.2006.11892554
Lalwani D. Young consumers online and offline channel purchase behaviour. 2017.
Broekhuizen TLJ. A Conceptual Model of Channel Choice : Measuring Online and Offline Shopping Value Perceptions. Synthesis (Stuttg). 2003;(January):1-37.
Ofir C, Simonson I. The effect of stating expectations on customer satisfaction and shopping experience. J Mark Res. 2007;44(1):164-174. doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.1.164
Marcketti SB, Shelley MC. Consumer concern , knowledge and attitude towards counterfeit apparel products. 2009;33(October 2004):327-337. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00748.x
Wahida Zulkifli N, Amir Mohd Yunus M, Fakarul Radzi Mohamed Mustafa M, et al. A Survey on Knowledge of Registered Drugs amongst Patients from the Specialist Clinic, Malaysia. Al-Nahrain J Sci. 2019;22(3):26-34. doi:10.22401/anjs.22.3.04
Zulkifli NW, Aziz NA, Hassan Y, Hassali MA, Bahrin NLZ. Development of Validated Questionnaire to Access Public Knowledge on Registered Drugs. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2015;172:749-753. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.428
Slyke C V., C. L. Comunale A, Belanger. F. “Gender Differences in Perceptions of Web-Based Shopping,.” New York. 2002;45(57):1-5.
Adjaino V. Shoppers’ Experience With Traditional and Online Shopping in Benin City. 2019;1(July):169-181.
Malek S, Taylor J, Mansell K. A questionnaire examining attitudes of collegiate athletes toward doping and pharmacists as information providers. Can Pharm J. 2014;147(6):352-358. doi:10.1177/1715163514552559
Weiss M, Grey E, Family H, Tsuyuki R, Sutton J. The role of the multidisciplinary team and its effect on the clinical roles of community pharmacists. 2014;(May):1-72.
Sarkar R, Das DS. Online Shopping vs Offline Shopping : A Comparative Study. 2017. 2017;3(1):1367-1368.
Bachrach D, Ogilvie J, Rapp A, Calamusa J. More Than a Showroom: Strategies for Winning Back Online Shoppers. 1st ed. Palgrave McMillian, US.; 2016.
Nielsen. MALAYSIANS RANK AMONG THE WORLD’S MOST AVID ONLINE SHOPPERS. Nielsen. https://www.nielsen.com/my/en/press-releases/2014/e-commerce/. Published 2014. Accessed November 1, 2020.