DIFFERENCES IN FERTILITY BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE USERS IN INDONESIAN WOMEN

  • Terry Y.R. Pristya Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, 12450, Indonesia
  • Anni Fithriyatul Mas'udah Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Ponorogo, 63471, Indonesia
  • Ulya Qoulan Karima Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, 12450, Indonesia.
  • Lufthans Arstipendy Master Global Urban Health, Center for Medicine and Society, Faculty of Humanities, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79098, Germany
Keywords: contraceptive, fertility, women

Abstract

The national Total Fertility Rate in Indonesia was 2.4 children per woman. The use of contraception is being promoted to reduce fertility rates which can quickly increase the number of elderly. There are two types of contraceptive methods, namely modern and traditional contraception. This study was aimed to determine the differences in fertility between traditional and modern contraceptive users in Indonesian women. This study was quantitative research with a cross-sectional design that was a further analysis of the 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) 2017. This study was restricted to 30,101 respondents selected through a complex sample design. The multiple logistic regression analysis was used in this study. The results of the study indicated that women who used traditional methods had 1.8 times (95%CI 1.4-2.4) more chances of having more than two children compared to women who didn’t use any contraception. While women who used modern methods had 2.4 times (95s%CI 0.1-40.9) more chance of having more than two children compared to women who didn’t use any contraception. There was a modifier effect between contraceptive use and socio-economic level on fertility. Therefore, it is necessary to have regulations governing the use and planning of contraception on the number of children to reduce its impact in the future.

References

1. United Nations Population Division. Population by Country. 2020. www.worldometers.info (accessed 17 Jul 2020).

2. Jayani DH. Jumlah Penduduk Dunia pada 2019 Capai 7,7 Miliar Jiwa. 2019. https://databoks.katadata.co.id (accessed 17 Jul 2020).

3. Rochaida E. Dampak Pertumbuhan Penduduk terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Keluarga Sejahtera di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. FORUM Ekon 2016;18(1):14-24.

4. WorldBank. Fertility rate, total (births per woman). 2020. https://data.worldbank.org (accessed 17 Jul 2020).

5. WorldPopulationReview. Total Fertility Rate 2020. 2020. https://worldpopulationreview. com (accessed 17 Jul 2020).

6. BKKBN, BPS, Kemenkes, USAID. Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey. 2017. Jakarta; 2018.

7. Sari N. Determinan Fertilitas melalui Pendekatan Total Fertlity Rate (TFR) di Indonesia: Analisis Data Survei Demografi Kesehatan Indonesia (SDKI) Tahun 2007. J Dunia Kesmas 2017; 6(2):55–62.

8. Wicaksono F, Mahendra D. Determinan Fertilitas: Suatu Pendekatan Multilevel. J Ilm Widya2 2016; 3(3):134–9.

9. Bongaarts J. The effect of contraception on fertility: Is sub-Saharan Africa different? Demogr Res 2017; 37(1):129–46.

10. Arsyad SS, Nurhayati S. Determinan Fertilitas di Indonesia. J Kependud Indones 2017; 11(1):1.

11. USAID. Family Planning and Reproductive Health | U.S. Agency for International Development 2020. www.usaid.gov/global-health/health-areas/family-planning (accessed 17 Jul 2020).

12. Cicih LHM. Info Demografi. 2019. www.bkkbn.go.id/po-content/uploads/INFO_DEMO_2019_02.pdf (accessed 17 Jul 2020).

13. The DHS Program-Indonesia: Standard DHS, 2017 Dataset. 2020. www.dhsprogram.com (accessed 15 Oct 2020).

14. Ho R. Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation with SPSS. US: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. 2006.

15. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning Text Third Edition Statistic for Biology and Health. 3rd ed. London: Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London; 2010.

16. ICF. Demographic and Health Surveys Standard Recode Manual for DHS7. The Demographic and Health Surveys Program. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF; 2018.

17. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril 2017;108(3):393–406.

18. Bongaarts J. Global fertility and population trends. Semin Reprod Med 2015; 33(1):5–10.

19. Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem 2018; 62:2–10.

20. BPS, Bappenas, UNFPA. Indonesia Population Projection. 2013. www.bappenas.go.id/files/5413/9148/4109 (accessed 19 Oct 2020)

21. Wilde MJ. Birth Control Battles. University of California Press 2019. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvqr1b35 (accessed 17 Jul 2020).

22. Emina JBO, Chirwa T, Kandala NB. Trend in the use of modern contraception in sub-Saharan Africa: Does women’s education matter? Contraception 2014; 90(2):154–61.

23. BKKBN. BKKBN Terus Berusaha Capai Target Renstra 2015-2019. www.bkkbn.go.id (accessed 18 Oct 2020)

24. Hubacher D, Trussell J. A definition of modern contraceptive methods. Contraception 2015; 92:420–1.

25. Simanjuntak H, Lestari BW, Anwar AD. The effect of structured counseling towards knowledge, attitude, and participation of modern contraceptive among unmet need couples. Kesmas 2016; 10(4):184–90.

26. Festin MPR. Overview of modern contraception. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020;66:4–14.

27. Ross J, Stover J. Use of modern contraception increases when more methods become available: Analysis of evidence from 1982-2009. Glob Heal Sci Pract 2013;1(2):203–12.

28. Lambert M, Begon E, Hocké C. Contraception for women after 40: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 2018; 46(12):865–72.

29. Batur P, Bowersox N, McNamara M. Contraception: Efficacy, Risks, Continuation Rates, and Use in High-Risk Women. J Women’s Heal 2016; 25(8):853–6.

30. Casey PM, Maclaughlin KL, Faubion SS. Impact of Contraception on Female Sexual Function. J Women’s Heal 2017; 26(3):207–13.

31. Festin MPR, Kiarie J, Solo J, et al. Moving towards the goals of FP 2020-classifying contraceptives. Contraception 2016; 94(4):289–94.

32. WHO/RHR. Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers. Baltimore and Geneva: World Health Organization and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/

33. WHO. Family Planning/Contraception Methods. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2020. www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception (accessed 19 Oct 2020)

34. Guillebaud J. Contraception Today. 2019. https://books.google.co.id/ (accessed 17 Jul 2020)

35. Kulu H. Why Do Fertility levels Vary Between Urban and Rural Areas. Reg Stud 2013; 47(6):895–912.

36. Prihyugiarto T, Setyonaluri D. Pola Determinan Fertilitas Menurut Provinsi, Indonesia: 2007-2012. J Kel Berencana 2018; 3(1):24–34.

37. Jatmiko YA, Wahyuni S. Determian Fertilitas di Indonesia Hasil SDKI 2017. Euclid 2019; 6(1):95.

38. Adria Wirda M, Irfany A, Septiyani D, et al. Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Fertilitas di Desa Laut Dendang Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan Kabupaten Deli Serdang. J Tunas Geogr 2019; 7(2):133–45.

39. Fort M, Schneeweis N, Winter-Ebmer R. Is Education Always Reducing Fertility? Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Reforms. Econ J 2016; 126(595):1823–55.

40. Impicciatore R, Zuanna GD. The impact of education on fertility in Italy, Changes across cohorts and south–north differences. Qual Quant 2017; 51(5):2293–317.
Published
2021-12-28
How to Cite
Pristya, T. Y., Mas’udah, A. F., Karima, U. Q., & Arstipendy, L. (2021). DIFFERENCES IN FERTILITY BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE USERS IN INDONESIAN WOMEN. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 21(3), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.21/no.3/art.916