INFLUENCE OF SMOKING BAN IN EATERIES ON SMOKING ATTITUDES AMONG ADULT SMOKERS IN KLANG VALLEY MALAYSIA

  • Jinat Ahmed School of Post-Graduate Studies, Perdana University, Malaysia
  • Mathialagan AG School of Post-Graduate Studies, Perdana University, Malaysia
  • Nazmul Hasan School of Post-Graduate Studies, Perdana University, Malaysia
Keywords: Smoking ban, Smoking attitudes, Klang Valley

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of smoking ban in eateries on smoking behaviors and intention to quit smoking among adult smokers in Klang Valley. A validated questionnaire was utilized for this study whereby three variables of the study (socio-demographic characteristics, smokers attitude, and intention to quit smoking) were measured. The structured questionnaire contained closed ended questions where present of dichotomous(yes/no), multiple choice questions and 7-point likert scale questions. 600 questionnaires were distributed to target respondents in eateries of Klang Valley. The inclusion criteria were local citizen of Malaysia, those who gave consent to take part in the study, literate in English, smokers aged 18 years old and above. The data were analyzed utilizing SPSS software version 21.0. There were 504 completed and usable responses received, which represented an 84% response rate. Majority of smokers in Klang Valley were male which constituted around 78.2% of the respondents. Manufactured cigarette, 75.2% was the most preferred type of nicotine among smokers.  Smokers attitude and social support with a smoking ban in restaurants and eateries was significantly associated with intention to quit smoking. 73.8% of smokers agree that the smoking ban in eateries and restaurants have reduced their daily smoking frequency and 58.3% of smokers agreed that the nationwide smoking ban at eateries and public places aspire them to quit smoking.Smoking ban is beneficial to help reduce prevalence of smoking among smokers that in turn helps to reduce secondary smoking and burden of non-communicable diseases in the long run. Though only a little over half of the respondents claimed that the ban inspires them to quit smoking, this is a positive start as the ban was just introduced. When effectively implemented, they are seen as an important element of policy to support behavior change in favor of a healthy lifestyle. The Ministry of Health should push forward with the ban on public smoking as soon as possible. The ban should be in tandem with efforts to help smokers quit. Implementing this scheme nationwide would be a remunerative move to help strive for a better health and cleaner environment for this country.

References

1. Vineis P, Airoldi L, Veglia F, et al. Environmental tobacco smoke and risk of respiratory cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in former smokers and never smokers in the EPIC prospective study. Bmj. 2005 Feb 3;330(7486):277.

2. Öberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A,et al. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. The lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):139-46.

3. Siegel M, Skeer M. Exposure to secondhand smoke and excess lung cancer mortality risk among workers in the “5 B’s”: bars, bowling alleys, billiard halls, betting establishments, and bingo parlours. Tobacco control. 2003 Sep 1;12(3):333-8.

4. Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Chrysohoou C, et al. Association between passive cigarette smoking and the risk of developing acute coronary syndromes: the CARDIO2000 study. Heart and vessels. 2002 May 1;16(4):127-30.

5. Iribarren C, Darbinian J, Klatsky AL,et al. Cohort study of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and risk of first ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Neuroepidemiology. 2004;23(1-2):38-44.

6. Report of the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Malaysia. Malaysia: Ministry of Health, 2012. https://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/survey/gats/mys/en/ [Accessed 2019 February 20]

7. Xiang Z, inventor; Kimree Technology Co Ltd, assignee. Method and system for controlling smoking in public area, and control method for electronic cigarette). United States patent application US 15/501,827. 2017 Aug 17.

8. Callinan JE, Clarke A, Doherty K, et al. Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010(4).


9. Galán I, Mata N, Estrada C, et al. Impact of the" Tobacco control law" on exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in Spain. BMC Public Health. 2007 Dec 1;7(1):224.

10. Thrasher JF, Swayampakala K, Arillo-Santillán E, et al. Differential impact of local and federal smoke-free legislation in Mexico: a longitudinal study among adult smokers. Salud publica de Mexico. 2010;52:S244-53.

11. Raute LJ, Gupta PC, Pednekar MS. Smoking ban and indoor air quality in restaurants in Mumbai, India. Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2011 May;15(2):68.

12. Government of Malaysia. Food act 1993: Control of tobacco product regulations 2004.https://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/files/live/Malaysia/Malaysia%20-%20TC%20Regs%202004.pdf [Accessed 2019 February 20].

13. Government of Malaysia. Declaration of non-smoking area 2019. http://www.federalgazette.agc.gov.my/
[Accessed 2019 April 15].

14. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva, 2003. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42811/9241591013.pdf;jsessionid=6E8EC6178EBB71A6A2C606CB1B5C2CD4?sequence=1 [Accessed 2019 April 18].

15. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Evaluating the effectiveness of smoke-free policies 2009. https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/handbook13.pdf [Accessed 2019 Apil 21].


16. Chapman S. Public health advocacy and tobacco control: Making smoking history. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing. 2007; 153- 160

17. Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, Hammond D,et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey. Tobacco control. 2006 Jun 1;15(suppl 3):iii51-8.

18. Li Q, Hyland A, O'Connor R, et al. Support for smoke-free policies among smokers and non-smokers in six cities in China: ITC China Survey. Tobacco Control. 2010 Oct 1;19(Suppl 2):i40-6.

19. Borland R, Mullins R, Trotter L, et al. Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia. Tobacco Control. 1999 Sep 1;8(3):266-71.

20. Wilson N, Weerasekera D, Blakely T, et al. What is behind smoker support for new smokefree areas? National survey data. BMC Public Health. 2010 Dec 1;10(1):498.

21. Yong HH, Foong K, Borland R, et al. Support for and reported compliance among smokers with smoke-free policies in air-conditioned hospitality venues in Malaysia and Thailand: findings from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2010 Jan;22(1):98-109.

22. Hock LK, Li LH, Huey TC, et al. Support for smoke-free policy among Malaysian adults: findings from a population-based study. BMJ open. 2019 Feb 1;9(2):e020304.


23. Rashid A, Ab Manan A, Yahya N, et al. The support for smoke free policy and how it is influenced by tolerance to smoking–experience of a developing country. PloS one. 2014;9(10).

24. Yasin SM, Isa MR, Fadzil MA, et al. Support for a campus tobacco-free policy among non-smokers: Findings from a developing Country. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17:275-80.

25. Institute for Public Health. (2015). National Health and Morbidity Survey 2015; 2: 83- 91.

26. Morgan, K. (1970). Sample size determination using Krejcie and Morgan table.

27. Mayne SL, Auchincloss AH, Tabb LP, et al. Associations of bar and restaurant smoking bans with smoking behavior in the CARDIA Study: A 25-Year Study. American journal of epidemiology. 2018 Jun 1;187(6):1250-8.

28. Minh Dao AT, Thi Thu Nguyen H, Kim GB, et al. Knowledge and Determinants of Health Consequences of Cigarette Smoking Among Vietnamese Adults, 2015. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2019 Jul;31(5):463-75.

29. Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, et al. Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco control. 2006 Jun 1;15(suppl 3):iii42-50.

30. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO urges health professionals to engage in tobacco control. https://www.who.int/tobacco/en/
[Accessed 2019 July 9].

31. Girvalaki C, Papadakis S, Vardavas C, et al. Smoking cessation delivery by general practitioners in Crete, Greece. The European Journal of Public Health. 2018 Jun 1;28(3):542-7.

32. Elton-Marshall T, Xu SS, Meng G, et al. The lower effectiveness of text-only health warnings in China compared to pictorial health warnings in Malaysia. Tobacco control. 2015 Nov 1;24(Suppl 4):iv6-13.

33. Cho YJ, Thrasher JF, Yong HH, et al. Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US. Social Science & Medicine. 2018 Jan 1;197:226-34.

34. Kostygina G, Szczypka G, Tran H, et al. Exposure and reach of the US court-mandated corrective statements advertising campaign on broadcast and social media. Tobacco control. 2019 Jun 21:tobaccocontrol-2018.
Published
2020-05-01
How to Cite
Jinat Ahmed, Mathialagan AG, & Nazmul Hasan. (2020). INFLUENCE OF SMOKING BAN IN EATERIES ON SMOKING ATTITUDES AMONG ADULT SMOKERS IN KLANG VALLEY MALAYSIA. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 20(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.20/no.1/art.554