COMPLETE BLOOD COUNT-BASED PREDICTIVE MODELLING FOR DIABETES MELLITUS AMONG MALAYSIAN WOMEN: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH SCREENING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.26/no.1/art.3522Keywords:
Diabetes mellitus, Women’s health, Complete blood count, Logistic regression, Bayesian regression, Public health screening, Predictive modellingAbstract
Diabetes mellitus is a major global public health concern, with a rising prevalence among women. Early prediction using routine clinical data, such as complete blood count (CBC) parameters, provides a cost-effective strategy for identifying individuals at risk. This study compared the effectiveness of classical binary logistic regression and Bayesian binary logistic regression in predicting diabetes mellitus among females using CBC parameters. Data from 537 female patients were analysed, incorporating CBC variables and diabetes status. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, posterior predictive checks, and sensitivity analyses. Bayesian diagnostics, including trace plots and credible intervals (Crls), were used to ensure model reliability. The Bayesian model outperformed the classical approach, demonstrating higher AUC, improved calibration, and more informative uncertainty estimation. Significant predictors included age, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), white blood cell count (WBC), haematocrit (HCT), platelet count, and haemoglobin (Hb). The Bayesian model produced stable posterior estimates and robust convergence, supporting its suitability for small or correlated datasets. These findings highlight the potential of CBC parameters as early indicators of diabetes risk among women and underscore the value of Bayesian modelling in informing gender-sensitive screening strategies and interventions.
References
https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v13i1.55583
https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.904
https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i38a32057
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.1008
https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v21i2.2687
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.949535
https://doi.org/10.14710/dmj.v12i5.38564
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112697
https://doi.org/10.5812/jcrps-133320
https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.105751
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010300
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3241
https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3641
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022215
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3137000/v1
https://doi.org/10.2147/dmso.s422373
https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol18iss4pp2217-2230
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64980-8
https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol17iss3pp1725-1738
https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.837533
https://doi.org/10.3390/life12091415
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05215-3
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1818/1/012016
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-194230/v1
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1386639
https://doi.org/10.47391/jpma.3205
https://doi.org/10.31801/cfsuasmas.614492
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8168479
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5002621/v1
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315678
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002673
https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology1010001
https://doi.org/10.47363/jdcrs/2023(4)134
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27340-2
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114684
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774811
https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.251
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00271-9
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00629