KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTION REGARDING PRENATAL GENETIC SCREENING OF THALASSEMIA, DOWN SYNDROME AND NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS: A STUDY AMONG IIUM KUANTAN UNDERGRADUATES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.18/no.1/art.246Keywords:
Prenatal genetic screening, undergraduate students, knowledge, perception, MalaysiaAbstract
Prenatal genetic screening is offered during pregnancy to detect foetuses that have certain diseases. It is widely used in the detection of congenital malformation which results in foetal birth defects. Unawareness of the society on the importance of prenatal genetic testing contributes to the increase in the birth defect rate.Future parents should be exposed with the importance in performing prenatal genetic screening.The purpose of this study was to examine the knowledge and perception level of International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) Kuantan students regarding prenatal genetic screening thalassemia, Down syndrome and neural tube defects.This is a cross-sectional study whereby192 respondents were selected using convenience sampling method. A set of close-ended questionnaire was distributed among students in IIUM Kuantan. Independent t-test, parametric test (One- Way ANOVA test), non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney test) and correlation coefficient(Pearson) were used to find all related factors influencing knowledge and perception and to find association between knowledge and perception of IIUM Kuantan students.From this study, it was found that the level of knowledge and perception of IIUM Kuantan students regarding prenatal genetic screening of thalassemia, Down syndrome and neural tube defects was relatively high. Married students hada betterknowledge compared to unmarriedstudents (p=0.008). Moreover, students from Kulliyyah (Faculty) of Medicine had adequate level of knowledge (p<0.001) and good perception (p=0.003) compared to students from other kulliyyahs. Age and year of study weresignificantly associated with students’ knowledge (p<0.001). In addition, ageand year of study were significantly associated with students’ perception(p=0.03 and p=0.007, respectively). The findings of this study depicted that adequate level of knowledge has ledto a good perception towards prenatal genetic screening among IIUM undergraduate students (p<0.001).
References
2. Boo NY, Cheah I, ThongM. Neural Tube Defects in Malaysia: Data from the Malaysian National Neonatal Registry. J Trop Pediatr2013; 59(5):338-342.
3. Aznal SS, Idris N. Obstetrics Review Article: Prenatal Screening For Fetal Anomalies: The Malaysian Perspective. Malays J ObstetGynaecol 2008; 8(16):1-10.
4. Thong MK, Ho JJ, Khatijah NN.A population-based study of birth defects in Malaysia. Ann Hum Biol2005;32(2):180-187.
5. Postoev et al. Changes in detection of birth defects and perinatal mortality after introduction of prenatal ultrasound screening in the Kola Peninsula (North-West Russia): combination of two birth registries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15(308):1-8.
6. Baird PA. Prenatal screening and the reduction of birth defects in populations. Community Genet 1999; 2:9–17.
7. Maternal screening for foetal abnormality[Internet]. 2017 [cited 12January 2017]. Available from:http://www.moh.gov.my/update2017/739.pdf
8. Georgsson S, Sahlin E, Iwarsson M, et al. Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) and Preferences for Risk Information among High School Students in Sweden. J Genet Couns 2016; 26(3):447-454.
9. Haga S, Barry W, Mills R, et al. Public Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013; 17(4):327-335.
10. Keng L, Stephen P, Yi L. Understanding undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge of, and attitudes to, prenatal genetic screening in Malaysia: A preliminary study. Int J AdvNurs Stud 2013; 2(2):101-106.
11. Wong L, George E, Tan J. A holistic approach to education programs in thalassemia for a multi-ethnic population: consideration of perspectives, attitudes, and perceived needs. J Community Genet 2011; 2(2):71-79.
12. Ngim CF, Lai NM, Ibrahim H, et al. Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and abortion in a multi-ethnic country: a survey among parents of children with thalassaemia major in Malaysia. J Community Genet 2013; 4(2): 215-21.
13. Ngim CF, Lai NM, Ibrahim H. Counseling for prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy due to thalassemia major: a survey of health care workers' practices in Malaysia. PrenatDiagn 2013; 33(13): 1226-32.
14. Naseem S, Ghazanfar H, Rashid S. Knowledge Practice Gap in prenatal diagnosis for ? Thalassemia – An overview from Pakistan. Rawal Med J 2016; 41(4):415-423.
15. Ishaq F, Abid H, Kokab F, et al. Awareness among parents of ?-thalassemia major patients, regarding prenatal diagnosis and premarital screening. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012; 22(4):218-221.
16. Cleary-Goldman J, Morgan M, Malone F, et al. Screening for Down Syndrome. ObstetGynecol2006; 107(1):11-17.
17. Mikamo S, Nakatsuka M. Knowledge and Attitudes toward Non-invasive Prenatal Testing among Pregnant Japanese Women. Acta Med Okayama 2015; 69(3):155-63.
18. Kou KO, Poon CF, Tse WC, et al. Knowledge and future preference of Chinese women in a major public hospital in Hong Kong after undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for positive aneuploidy screening: a questionnaire survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15(1): 1-7.
19. Lewis C, Hill M, Skirton H, et al. Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 24(6):809-816.
20. Kashyap N, Pradhan M, Kumar P, et al. Acceptance of non-invasive prenatal testing by cell freefoetal DNA for foetal aneuploidy in a developing country: experience at a tertiary care centre in India. Int J ReprodContraceptObstetGynecol 2016; 5(3):705-710.
21. Sahlin E, Nordenskjöld M, Gustavsson P, et al. Positive Attitudes towards Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in a Swedish Cohort of 1,003 Pregnant Women. PLoS One 2016; 11(5):e0156088.
22. Racusin DA, Villarreal S, Antony KM, et al. Role of Maternal Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein and Ultrasonography in Contemporary Detection of Spina Bifida.Am J Perinatol 2015;32(14):1287-91.
23. Mid-Trimester Maternal Serum hCG and AFP Levels: Clinical Significance and Prediction of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome. Int J EndocrinolMetab 2013; 11(2): 102–106.
24. Antenatal care at government clinics [Internet]. BabyCenter. 2015 [cited 6 June 2017]. Available from: https://www.babycenter.com.my/a1049800/antenatal-care-at-government-clinics
25. Youssef R, Weshahi H, Ashry M. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of women in the reproductive age towards prenatal screening for congenital malformations, Alexandria-Egypt. Int J ReprodContraceptObstetGynecol2017; 6(5):1707-1712.
