BARRIERS, STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF PRE-PREGNANCY CLINIC SERVICES IN SARAWAK: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS FROM PROVIDER PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.18/no.1/art.206Keywords:
Barriers, Perception, Pre-pregnancy Care, SarawakAbstract
Pre-pregnancy Clinic (PPC) services is one the plausible efforts towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals. However, various issues still need to be addressed for improvement of the services. Considering this view, an attempt was made to explore the barriers, strength and weakness of current practice of pre-pregnancy clinic services in Sarawak, since the programme has been implemented in this state from the year 2011. This cross-sectional study was conducted at nine selected health care facilities throughout Sarawak. A multistage sampling procedure was adapted to select the health care facilities. An unstructured open-ended questionnaire was administered to get the in-depth perceived views and current practice of pre-pregnancy clinic services. A total of 322 health care providers from nine selected health care facilities gave their feedback. In the present paper, a qualitative analysis was done for the open-ended questions to get in-depth views of barriers, strength and weakness of pre-pregnancy clinic services. The results of the study were narrated in textual form and a thematic analysis was done manually. The identified themes for perceived barriers to the provision of pre-pregnancy care were perception, attitude and acceptance of PPC services, socio-economic issues, services and client factors. The perceived weaknesses of the services are listed under two main themes: working environment and service factors, while, the strength of services produced three thematic areas which are preparation for pregnancy, prevention of mortality and morbidity and comprehensive services. Though pre-pregnancy services are beneficial for society wellbeing, various issues still need to be considered for the improvement of the quality of services. Lack of awareness, no ministerial guidelines or Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and knowledge pertaining to the services were few of the main areas which need to be pondered upon. Promotional activities and campaigns should be geared up ensuring availability the services to the general population.
References
2. Lu MC. Recommendations for Preconception Care. Am Fam Physician [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2018 Jun 18];76(3):397–400. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2007/0801/p397.html
3. World Health Organization. Maternal mortality [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland; 2014 [cited 2015 Jan 24]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/index.html#.UBNwlXxuAFI.mendeley
4. Ministry of Health, Malaysia. Perinatal Manual Care Manual [Internet]. Kuala Lumpur: Division of Family Health Development; 2013. Available from:http://fh.moh.gov.my/v3/index.php/component/jdownloads/send/18-sektor-kesihatan-ibu/224-perinatal-care-manual-3rd-edition-2013?option=com_jdownloads
5. Nik Mazlina M, Ruziaton H, Nuraini DB, Izan Hairani I, Norizzati B, Isa MR, et al. Risk factors for women attending pre-pregnancy screening in selected clinics in Selangor. Malays Fam Physician 2014;9(3):20–6.
6. Rahman M, Rahim NA, Arif MT. Barrier, weakness and utilization of pre-pregnancy clinic services. Arch Public Health [Internet]. 2017 Dec 25 [cited 2018 Jun 18];75:67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0236-2
7. Mazza D, Chapman A. Improving the uptake of preconception care and periconceptional folate supplementation: what do women think? BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2010 Dec 23[cited 2018 Jun 18];10:786. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-786
8. Mazza D, Chapman A, Michie S. Barriers to the implementation of preconception care guidelines as perceived by general practitioners: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2013 Jan 31 [cited 2018 Jun 18];13:36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-36
9. Tuomainen H, Cross-Bardell L, Bhoday M, Qureshi N, Kai J. Opportunities and challenges for enhancing preconception health in primary care: qualitative study with women from ethnically diverse communities. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2013 Jul 1 [cited 2018 Jun 18];3(7):e002977. Available from: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/7/e002977
10. van der Zee B, de Beaufort ID, Steegers EAP, Denktas S. Perceptions of preconception counselling among women planning a pregnancy: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2013 Jun;30(3):341–6.
11. Zee B van der. Preconception Care: Concepts and Perceptions: An ethical perspective [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Jun 18]. Available from: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/38735/
12. Kronfol NM. Access and barriers to health care delivery in Arab countries: a review. East Mediterr Health J [Internet]. 2012 Dec 1 [cited 2018 Jun 18];18(12):1239–46. Available from: http://applications.emro.who.int/emhj/v18/12/EMHJ_2012_18_12_1239_1246.pdf?ua=1
13. Okigbo C. Provider Education: Key to Improving Young Women’s Use of Reproductive Health Services in Urban Nigeria. 2014;3.
14. Rosliza A, Majdah M. Male Participation and Sharing of Responsibility in Strengthening Family Planning Activities in Malaysia. Malays J Public Health Med [Internet]. 2010;10(1):23–7. Available from: https://www.mjphm.org.my/mjphm/journals/Volume10.1/(4)%20MALE%20PARTICIPATION%20AND%20SHARING%20OF%20RESPONSIBILITY%20IN%20STRENHTHENING%20FAMILY%20PLANNING%20ACTIVITIES%20IN%20MALAYSIA.pdf
15. Kabagenyi A, Jennings L, Reid A, Nalwadda G, Ntozi J, Atuyambe L. Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services: a qualitative study of men and women’s perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda. Reprod Health. 2014 Mar 5;11(1):21.
16. Onasoga AO, Osaji TA, Alade OA, Egbuniwe MC. Awareness and barriers to utilization of maternal health care services among reproductive women in Amassoma community, Bayelsa State. Int J Nurs Midwifery [Internet]. 2014 Jan 31 [cited 2018 Jun 18];6(1):10–5. Available from: http://academicjournals.org/journal/IJNM/article-abstract/32F02EB42256
17. Bakeera SK, Wamala SP, Galea S, State A, Peterson S, Pariyo GW. Community perceptions and factors influencing utilization of health services in Uganda. Int J Equity Health [Internet]. 2009 Jul 14 [cited 2018 Jun 18];8:25. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717964/
18. Bronstein JM, Felix HC, Bursac Z, Stewart MK, Foushee HR, Klapow J. Providing general and preconception health care to low income women in family planning settings: Perception of providers and clients. Matern Child Health J [Internet]. 2012 Feb 1 [cited 2018 Jun 18];16(2):346–54. Available from: https://uthsc.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/providing-general-and-preconception-health-care-to-low-income-wom
19. Otiniano AD, Muthengi E, Harding C, Lau YY, Higgins C, Eldahaby M, et al. Perceived Barriers to Preconception Care: In 2007. p. 1. Available from: http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/mch/lamb/Results/2007Results/APHABarrierstoPreconception%20Care_101208.pdf
20. Dehne KL, Riedner G. Sexually transmitted infections among adolescents: the need for adequate health services. Reprod Health Matters. 2001 May;9(17):170–83.
21. Ghafari M, Shamsuddin K, Amiri M. Barriers to utilization of health services: Perception of postsecondary school malaysian urban youth. Int J Prev Med [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Jun 18];5(7):805–6. Available from: https://ukm.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/barriers-to-utilization-of-health-services-perception-of-postseco
22. Wy L. Malaysian youth sexuality: issues and challenges. J Health Transl Med [Internet]. 2009 Jun 29 [cited 2018 Jun 18];12(1):3–14. Available from: https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/jummec/article/view/4610
23. Bayrami R, Roudsari RL, Allahverdipour H, Javadnoori M, Esmaily H. Experiences of women regarding gaps in preconception care services in the Iranian reproductive health care system: A qualitative study. Electron Physician [Internet]. 2016 Nov 25 [cited 2018 Jun 18];8(11):3279–88. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5217821/
