WHY DO VILLAGERS HESITATE TO USE THE TOILET FOR DEFECATION?: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY IN DAYAK BAKUMPAI PEOPLE IN SOUTH BORNEO, INDONESIA

Authors

  • indrayadi Indrayadi Doctoral Program of Public Health, School of Graduate, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.
  • Retna Siwi Padmawati Department of Health Behavior, Environment, and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
  • Ari Probandari Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.23/no.1/art.1794

Keywords:

Dayak Bakumpai, latrine Use, Pits, Sanitation

Abstract

Bakumpai Dayak people, residing along the fast-flowing Barito River, have long been engaged in the practice of defecating in the river. Despite the efforts of the government to combat open defecation, this behavior has remained persistent in the community. Therefore, this study aims to explore the causes of the non-use of toilets by Bakumpai Dayak people. This was an ethnographic study, and data were collected from 11 respondents using participant observations, as well as in-depth and group interviews. The observation revealed that the community already had knowledge about hygienic toilets, but could not stop the practice of open defecation. In the area, the floating latrines employed were of various types, which were tailored to suit the specific geographical conditions of the village. Bakumpai Dayak people had a high water demand to meet their defecation, bathing, and washing needs. Furthermore, the respondents believed that floating latrines had several advantages over conventional toilets, such as the central concept of invisible stool in defecation. Based on these findings, open defecation-free status could only be achieved by implementing sanitation interventions that considered the long-standing social culture and habits of the community

Author Biography

Ari Probandari, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.

Professor of public health

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Kentingan, Kec. Jebres, Kota Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57126, Indonesia

References

UNICEF, WHO. State of the World’s Sanitation. 2020.

The United Nations Development Programme. Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Dev Program. 2017;

Okullo JO, Moturi WN, Ogendi GM. Open Defaecation and Its Effects on the Bacteriological Quality of Drinking Water Sources in Isiolo County, Kenya. Environ Health Insights [Internet]. 2017;11:117863021773553. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1178630217735539

Njuguna J. Effect of eliminating open defecation on diarrhoeal morbidity: An ecological study of Nyando and Nambale sub-counties, Kenya. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2016;16(1):2–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3421-2

Venugopal V, Rekha S, Manikandan K, Latha PK, Vennila V, Ganesan N, et al. Heat stress and inadequate sanitary facilities at workplaces–an occupational health concern for women? Glob Health Action. 2016;9(1).

Organization WH. Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines. Switzerland; 2017.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Monitoring Data STBM [Internet]. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2020. Available from: http://monev.stbm.kemkes.go.id/monev/

Budhi S. Bakumpai People , Religion and Identity an Regional Autonomy. Int J Dev Res. 2017;07(01):11427–33.

Dey S. Causes and Consequences of Open Defecation and Improper Sanitation : A Study in Polempur Village , Khandaghosh Block , Bardhaman. Int J Res Anal Rev. 2018;5(3):774–80.

Vyas S SD. Sanitation and Religion in South Asia: What Accounts for Differences across Countries? J Dev Stud. 2018;54(11).

Yulyani V, Dina Dwi N, Kurnia D. Latrine use and associated factors among rural community in Indonesia. Malaysian J Public Heal Med. 2019;19(1):143–51.

Dwipayanti NMU, Rutherford S, Chu C. Cultural determinants of sanitation uptake and sustainability: Local values and traditional roles in Rural Bali, Indonesia. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2019;9(3):438–49.

Bicchieri C, Ashraf S, Das U, Kohler H-P, Kuang J, McNally P, et al. Social Networks and Norms: Sanitation in Bihar and Tamil Nadu, India. Penn Soc Norms Gr [Internet]. 2017; Available from: https://repository.upenn.edu/pennsong/16

Routray P, Schmidt W-P, Boisson S, Clasen T, Jenkins MW. Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: An exploratory qualitative study Global health. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2015;15(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2206-3

Coffey D, Spears D, Vyas S. Switching to sanitation: Understanding latrine adoption in a representative panel of rural Indian households. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2017;188:41–50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.001

Murphy HM, McBean EA, Farahbakhsh K. Appropriate technology - A comprehensive approach for water and sanitation in the developing world. Technol Soc [Internet]. 2009;31(2):158–67. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.010

Avvannavar SM, Mani M. A conceptual model of people’s approach to sanitation. Sci Total Environ. 2008;390(1):1–12.

Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L. HANDBOOK of ETHNOGRAPHY Edited. 2001.

Beier D, Brzoska P, Khan MH. Indirect consequences of extreme weather and climate events and their associations with physical health in coastal Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1).

Miller AC, Ramananjato RH, Garchitorena A, Rabeza VR, Gikic D, Cripps A, et al. Baseline population health conditions ahead of a health system strengthening program in rural Madagascar. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1).

Ompad DC, Kessler A, Van Eijk AM, Padhan TK, Haque MA, Sullivan SA, et al. The effectiveness of malaria camps as part of the Durgama Anchalare Malaria Nirakaran (DAMaN) program in Odisha, India: study protocol for a cluster-assigned quasi-experimental study. Glob Health Action. 2021;14(1).

WHOUNICEF. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2020: five years into the SDGs [Internet]. Joint Water Supply, & Sanitation Monitoring Programme. 2021. 1–164 p. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bookorders.

Jain A, Fernald LCH, Smith KR, Subramanian S V. Sanitation in rural India: Exploring the associations between dwelling space and household latrine ownership. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5).

UNICEF. Community-Led Total Sanitation in East Asia and Pacific: Progress, Lessons, and Directions. Vol. VII, British Travel Health Association. 2013. 1–126 p.

Taylor JG. Indonesia: Peoples and Histories. , CT, USA. United States of America: Yale University Press, New Haven; 2003.

Stein EA. ‘Sanitary Makeshifts’ and the perpetuation of health stratification in Indonesia. Hahn RA, M. C. Inhorn E, editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.; 2009.

Engel S, Susilo A. Shaming and sanitation in indonesia: A return to colonial public health practices? Dev Change. 2014;45(1):157–78.

Dwipayanti NMU, Phung TD, Rutherford S, Chu C. Towards sustained sanitation services: A review of existing frameworks and an alternative framework combining ecological and sanitation life stage approaches. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2017;7(1):25–42.

Kanda A, Ncube EJ, Voyi K. Adapting sanitation needs to a latrine design (And its upgradable models): A mixed method study under lower middle-income rural settings. Sustain. 2021;13(23).

Harfield SG, Davy C, McArthur A, Munn Z, Brown A, Brown N. Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models: A systematic scoping review. Global Health. 2018;14(1):1–11.

Alhassan A, Anyarayor BK. Determinants of adoption of open defecation-free (ODF) innovations: A case study of Nadowli-Kaleo district, Ghana. J Dev Commun Stud. 2018;5(2):54.

Huang L, Qiu M, Zhou M. Correlation between general health knowledge and sanitation improvements: evidence from rural China. npj Clean Water [Internet]. 2021;4(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41545-021-00111-8

Veerapu N, Subramaniyan P, Praveenkumar B, Arun G. Promotion of sanitation and hygiene in a rural area of South India: A community-based study. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2016;5(3):587.

Djonoputro ER, Blackett I, Weitz A, Lambertus A, Siregar R, Arianto I, et al. Buku Penuntun : Opsi Sanitasi yang Terjangkau Untuk Daerah Spesifik. Wsp. 2007;1–42.

Sandison P. Community Engagement in Sanitation: A Landscape Review. 2018;(August).

O’Connell K. What Influences Open Defecation and Latrine Ownership in Rural Households?: Findings from a Global Review. 2014;(August):38.

Mukherjee A, Lama M, Khakurel U, Jha AN, Ajose F, Acharya S, et al. Perception and practices of menstruation restrictions among urban adolescent girls and women in Nepal: A cross-sectional survey. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):1–10.

Dittmer A. Towards total sanitation : Socio-cultural barriers and triggers to total sanitation in West Africa. WaterAid Rep. 2009;16.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-24

How to Cite

Indrayadi, indrayadi, Pamungkasari, E. P., Padmawati, R. S. ., & Probandari, A. (2023). WHY DO VILLAGERS HESITATE TO USE THE TOILET FOR DEFECATION?: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY IN DAYAK BAKUMPAI PEOPLE IN SOUTH BORNEO, INDONESIA. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 23(1), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.23/no.1/art.1794